What are Argumentations about the innovation of Blockchain?

The generation of today when it comes to virtual transactions focused on the various strategies and methods when it comes to business. Most companies seek reality and not a myth. When we say blockchain, it was a kind of software in which people will virtually make their money on the internet. With this innovation, many users and clients today who really applied this to their trading and their way of living in earning a lot of money on the internet virtually are both gained benefits. But, there are also many people who until now continued questioning and arguing on how real the blockchain is. Some of them thought that blockchain is just another kind of scheme that would get their money away when the time comes, or maybe blockchain will be gone once the users have traded a big amount of money into it.

             Blockchain gives lots of opportunities to the users to come up with great and easy trading of money virtually. With this, many people asked if it is legit or not, and also, if it was really a good idea to deal with this particular application. Different arguments have existed about this certain technology on the internet. The active users of this software were currently felt satisfied with how and what this certain software helped them to have a transaction virtually, rather than going to the bank and go the line that would result from the stress and traffic. This online innovation helped them a lot and also saved money for their transaction. But, despite everything that this software was given to them, they still have an argument if this innovation is really true or it was just a myth or another scheme that will just steal their money in the long run. The argument of blockchain based on the perspective of users will be discussed in this paper with the full supports of explanations from various research.

How Blockchain Overcoming Security Issues in Healthcare EHR?

Overtaking will occur into the protocol

            The development of Bitcoin and other computerized monetary forms is sure to move society into an advanced resource future. In any case, the inquiry is whether the Bitcoin blockchain, out of all the virtual monetary forms and comparative conventions, will direct all or a critical segment of these exchanges. All things considered, there as of now right around 700 other advanced monetary forms, and without a doubt more to be made. Since it’s so early, and for a few of the reasons laid out above, specifically administration issues, there’s a probability that Bitcoin could go the method for MySpace or AOL and that another convention overwhelms it.

             The CEO of bitcoin stated that they would first need to defeat Bitcoin’s security and liquidity properties and after that, the presumably change from Bitcoin into just that option — in light of the fact that there would never again be motivation to acknowledge Bitcoin.  Because the estimation of the money and system is just understood the more others utilize it if individuals start to see that another system is superior to Bitcoin — either on account of its specialized abilities or on the grounds that it isn’t hindered by administration issues — that could sap the estimation of the cash.

            A few contenders for conventions that represent a risk to Bitcoin incorporate Ethereum, which has more specialized abilities than Bitcoin and cash called either; Ripple, another convention concentrated on global installments with money, XRP; and new conventions being produced by the innovation and monetary enterprises, for example, the Open Ledger Project supervised by the Linux Foundation, with cooperation from IBM, Cisco, Intel, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo, Accenture, and others. The remainder of these is especially fascinating in light of the fact that it is open source like Bitcoin, yet could likewise resolve a portion of the administration issues that Bitcoin has confronted. It was a threat to the banking industry.

How Blockchain Technology Will Change the World In the Future?

            As considered, Blockchain could be a threat to the banking industry today. In any case, what is that danger? Since cryptographic forms of money, specifically Bitcoin, became exposed, the huge banks have experienced diverse “inclinations” in regards to them. At the outset, the majority of them demonstrated numbness and even hatred. As the innovation was produced and its utilization expanded, this inclination swung to fear when, what’s more, the considerable potential outcomes offered by this new framework could be acknowledged without the need of their support or, further, of their reality. At long last, and got from the dread of being let well enough alone for the amusement, sentiments of profound respect and confidence have stirred, which has driven customary managing an account to give necessary ventures to misuse the extensive variety of changes introduced.

            Here it is vital to take note that there are numerous desires in innovation, however not in money. Today, Blockchain is personally connected to the utilization of Bitcoin, and the survival of one without the other isn’t clear. In this sense, the signs demonstrate that the banks expect to apply the innovation to their business forms, leaving aside the bother that it would mean for them to do it together with money initially intended to isolate them from the framework. However, would it bode well to make private channels oversaw by each of them? All things considered, they would unmistakably leave from the theory of decentralization, and the procedure of accord and/or investment would be restricted. What’s more, for what reason not think about a chain shared by the enormous world banks?

How can blockchain technology be used to solve major real-life problems?

This alternative isn’t exceptionally implausible since lately, it is realized that more than a score of banks have combined around R3, an organization committed to the advancement and development of money-related advances as methods for keeping up their transcendent positions in the market. Likewise, many have started to make noteworthy interests in this strategy, for example, BBVA in Coinbase Santander in Ripple. What is sure is that the joining of Blockchain to conventional keeping money would suggest from the earlier the huge improvement of managing account procedures and cost structures. For instance, worldwide exchanges could be made at essentially zero cost, without the desire for the investment of parallel information systems, providing current frameworks, for example, SWIFT.

It is said that blockchain is a sign for health sector

On May 16, the Catalan Society of Digital Health, with the collaboration of UNITS and IN2, organized the “Blockchain and its application in the health field” with the aim of publicizing Blockchain technology and generating a space of reflection and debate about the eruption of it in the Health sector. The session led by the consultant Joan Guanyabens had several speakers from the public and private sectors with the aim of drawing a perspective enriched with different views of the potential uses of Blockchain to the sector.

             Jesús Ruiz, executive of Innovation at the Banco de Santander did a prologue to the Blockchain innovation and, from the introduction of a few instances of utilization, commented that notwithstanding the application in the decentralization of plans of action that as of now require a focal substance; Blockchain likewise permits to help the digitalization procedures of decentralized situations (for instance, cooperatives between a few nations/associations).

Concerning the well-being part, Ruiz specified, among others, the conceivable outcomes encompassing the administration of electronic patient data and featured the procedure that has just been propelled in the United States by the US Department of (HHS) to recognize instances of     Blockchain use in the wellbeing segment that as of now has 15 chosen application projects. From the Government of the Generalitat, Jordi Puigneró, ICT Secretary of the Government of the Generalitat of Catalonia, explained the SmartCAT country strategy that aims to digital transformation within the different areas of public services. Puigneró remarked that Blockchain is a disruptive technology to which the Government is paying special attention and as an example of this he made reference to the collaboration with Bacon and the beginning of his Catalan Chapter and also to the masterclasses that have been promoted for the next dates (Tapscott & Tapscott, 2016). Puigneró mentioned the agreement for the deployment of a Verified Identity system as a first step in the same direction. Finally, he introduced some possible applications of health technology (avoid falsification of drugs or avoid cybersecurity problems.

            Kim Kismet, from her experience in the use of blockchain, defended not only the disruptive advantage of blockchain but also the strength of bitcoin Finally, Miquel Àngel Bru from Made of Gens, the startup dedicated to the commercialization of applications and services around the human genome that has received numerous awards at an international level, explained his experience in the use of Blockchain especially as a solution for informed consents. In the subsequent debate, it focused on the compatibility of blockchain with the European norm of oblivion, to the respect it was argued that blockchain would allow empowering the citizen of his data and that in this way also of the use of the same. There was also the reflection on the need for a regulatory framework that gives legal backing to the uses of technology. Innovation, advancing today to create the solutions of tomorrow, is part of the DNA of IN2, the disruption of Blockchain technology and its impact on the health sector, is one of the opportunities on which our professionals are already working.

What Is Blockchain Technology, And How Can It Be Used In Organizations And Industries To Create Value?

The blockchain as a promising pillar of a decentralized future

In a world in which no legislature can make more Bitcoins, these Central Banks would contend openly with each other, offering physical and advanced money-related instruments in light of Bitcoin. Without a moneylender of final resort, partial hold managing an account would turn into an enormously risky issue, and the main banks that would make due in the long haul would be banks that offered 100% monetary instruments supported by Bitcoin, which would settle installments among their own particular clients outside of the Blockchain of Bitcoin, and that they would complete the last day by day settlement with alternate Banks, through the Blockchain.

            Saifedean has composed a book called The Bitcoin Standard: The  Alternative to Banking that is now accessible in presale in Amazon here in which he clarifies how Bitcoin’s fundamental offer is as strong cash, revealing insight into the significance of this idea through history, which far surpasses the essentialness of the expenses for little exchanges for utilization installments. Strong cash has been a fundamental mainstay of various civic establishments, and its end has as a rule harmonized with the finish of the human advancement being referred to. The cutting-edge world was worked in the nineteenth century on the premise of strong cash, gold, financed by financial specialists with an inclination for the low time, acquired from strong cash. The shopper culture of immediate satisfaction of the twentieth century (high-time inclination), then again, has been the way of life of the endlessly profitable guardian cash, which demoralizes sparing, and supports limitation. The defenders of this type of scheme have already made it clear that the possibilities of the blockchain are almost unlimited when applying to new markets and existing ones, as well as to new services (or existing ones) that pass to that decentralized philosophy.

            The network of users of this scheme becomes a source of trust, a way of conferring legitimacy on the currency or object that is accepted in the chain of blocks. As with the Internet, nobody owns it, but everyone can participate freely. As they reveal in BackChannel, the fields of application of the chain of blocks are as we said very many. In ” Bitcoin: It’s the platform, not the currency, stupid! ” (” Bitcoin: it’s the platform, not the currency, stupid! “) Already made an excellent manifesto about the possibilities of this decentralized transaction platform and its potential applications. Obviously, the financial system and its transformation to a decentralized segment are especially attractive. Goodbye to the banks (well, perhaps it would be a good deal later) and the influence that these entities have on society. Some have already described Bitcoin as the Napster of finance, but in reality, it is not an appropriate comparison since Napster provided that P2P scheme for the exchange of content (specifically, songs) protected by copyright. The final effect would be nevertheless the same: it would transform the financial industry as Napster did in the music segment.

            Although there are attempts to bring about this transformation with bitcoins, there are other important efforts underway, and one of the most noteworthy is Ethereum, a non-profit organization created by a 21-year-old Russian-Canadian named Vitalik Buterin. This developer is especially ambitious in his application of the chain of blocks and among other things he wants to convert his own cryptocurrency, the Ether (what a name so appropriate for a science fiction film), at the base of this new decentralized structure. Buterin has managed to capture the interest of the community of users – they have already invested nearly 20 million dollars in the project thanks to a campaign of collective financing in bitcoins – and of the developers who have started to collaborate with him.

              With Ethereum, despite the revolution that arises, it goes beyond the currency, and theoretically, it could be applicable to any service or segment thanks to the use of a chain of blocks compatible with different programming languages ( Vukolić, 2015). As Buterin himself explained, ” instead of Javascript making calls to the server, you could make calls to the blockchain .” The concept, of course, is ambitious. Other ideas direct bitcoin and the chain of blocks to that concept as attractive but as difficult to carry out as micropayments. This is what they are trying, for example, in Ripple Labs – they started as OpenCoin – and its Ripple protocol for fast, simple, and secure transactions, which also do not have to be done with bitcoins. Even so, it has recently received criticism for its “not so decentralized” operation and the freezing of $ 1 million of user funds, which makes it clear that although on paper these projects look very promising, there are lights but also shadows in them.

             In fact, in American Banker they spoke recently about how the massive appearance of various projects with blockchains other than bitcoin is interesting because of the ideas that are provided -Ethereum and Ripple are two good examples, as is Eris Industries-, but it adds complexity and fragmentation and that slows the advance of this technology in consolidated markets. Anyway, even the new commitment to collective financing services such as Kickstarter has its translation into the Bitcoin world: anyone will be able to start their own campaign soon – in bitcoins, of course – if it makes use of developments such as the Lighthouse Project, whose creator He promised to have it ready very soon.

Limitations of Blockchain and Emerging Concepts.

The blockchain as the key to decentralization

The decentralization (and its consequence, democratization) of this type of segment is being seen as the great revolution of our time, and this chain of blocks seems to be the key component of this potential global decentralization (Crosby, Pattanayak, Verma, & Kalyanaraman, 2016). Now it remains to be seen if this type of project manages to take off, but everything points to the fact that the implementation will be long and tedious. It is happening with bitcoin, the cryptocurrency for which many entrepreneurs sigh: in these years of availability there has been a real frenzy by bitcoin mining and the emergence of alternatives that promised to deal with the theoretical disadvantages of that original project. The same is happening with the chain of blocks, which seems even more promising because of the impact it could have on that democratization not only of finances but of a multitude of additional segments. The transparency and efficiency of this “protocol” are really promising, and prior this concept may be one of the most relevant in the future. Whatever happens, we will be here to tell you.

From Smart Contracts to Creative Commons

What has caused a possible rapprochement between BlockChain and Creative Commons is that the “chain of blocks” also has a legal side, through what are called ”  smart contracts. Where Bitcoin aimed to implement a virtual and decentralized currency, other applications of the BlockChain are intended to allow players to enter into relationships through automated contracts (smart contracts) ”  to execute a transaction and/or code between two partners who validated it “. This is where a hangout was possible with the Commons licenses, which was experimented with in partnership with the Ascribe.io service. In a first post published in May 2015, Creative Commons presented the new service offered by this way to creators wishing to use the CC for the dissemination of their works.

            Identity management is another segment in which the chain of blocks is also beginning to take important steps. Nowadays it is difficult to verify the identity of a user, something that in fact would make it much easier to establish a more reliable electronic payments system. This would also serve to eliminate the centralization imposed by social networks such as Twitter or Facebook when it comes to identifying us and would make that work -not to store the messages- be carried out by projects such as Twister or Trust, which try to guarantee the integrity of the messages verifying that who has sent and published them is who they say they are and that the message has not arrived “modified” by third parties.

             Another problem that could help solve the blockchain is the management of copyright and creative work licenses. At Ascribe they have been working with Creative Commons France for some time to produce a system with which authors and creators could access a new way to verify that they are responsible for work, manage its use – all transactions (“publications”) would be registered in the chain of blocks “- or share it.

             This impact is already being felt in several consolidated institutions, which do not seem to renounce the benefits that the blockchain can provide. Its experimental implementation is now a reality in the Nasdaq Private Market. In Spain, we have been able to see the interest of several banks such as Bankinter or BBVA for bitcoin, and recently we have learned of the interest of Banco Santander not just for the bitcoin, but for the chain of blocks: this group has invested in companies that are researching in the way to take advantage of that philosophy in traditional banking, something that other giants like Barclays are doing.

Blockchain and the legalization of sharing

The area that could benefit from being redesigned in connection with Blockchain is the legalization of the non-commercial sharing of works on the Internet. Several proposals, such as the global license, global sponsorship, or creative contribution, have imagined ending the war on sharing by legalizing the exchange of words between individuals in return for a new remuneration distributed to creators. For example, it was proposed to set up shared funding for the creation via a surcharge of a few euros at the cost of the Internet subscription that would be paid by each home and donated to the authors according to the volume of sharing of their works. But these proposals ran into difficulties with regard to the tracing of exchanges related to each work, their quantification, and then the distribution of sums between the different creators.

            The initial global license proposal envisaged transferring the collected sums to traditional collecting societies ( with all the bias in the distribution that this would have caused ). Philippe Aigrain’s proposal for a creative contribution, supported by La Quadrature du Net, favored the implementation of a new management system that was more transparent and better controlled by citizens. But a criticism that came up often was the obligation to put in place to achieve such a result of a system of monitoring exchanges between individuals in order to be able to assess the volumetrics and allocate the sums to different artists. Such a solution would have been close enough to what Hadopi was doing in the context of the graduated response and posed real problems of invasion of privacy.


            To overcome this difficulty, La Quadrature’s proposal envisaged instead going through panels of voluntary users to evaluate trade volumes from their practices (a bit like the measurement of ratings). This solution would have been practicable, but it kept something unsatisfactory. But Blockchain may also be able to overcome these difficulties. With this decentralized registry system, it is not necessary that the distribution of the sums collected passes through a centralized body (neither the old collecting societies nor new ones). If the interchange of works between individuals is done through a chain of blocks, the database can be collectively hosted in a distributed manner, like the BitCoin registry. As we saw above, Blockchain would also allow creators to simply declare their catalog of works and obtain remuneration for the uses, through a public and transparent algorithm, the parameters of which could here be set by law.

            The explanation behind the enthusiasm for this is the focal properties that give security, obscurity, and data integrity with no outsider association responsible for the exchanges, and hence it makes intriguing examination zones, particularly from the viewpoint of specialized difficulties and restrictions. In this paper, we have led a deliberate mapping study with the objective of gathering all significant research on Blockchain technology.  We have removed 41 essential papers from logical databases. The outcomes demonstrate that concentration in more than 80% of the papers is on Bitcoin framework and under 20% manages other Blockchain applications including smart contracts and authorizing. The larger part of this paper is concentrating on uncovering and enhancing confinements of Blockchain from protection and security points of view, yet a significant number of the proposed arrangements need solid assessment on their adequacy.

Similar Posts